We use various third-party cookies to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. Please use the options below to manage your cookie settings. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Please be aware, if you deny cookies, certain features of our website may not work.
This will apply to all services
Google Analytics
YouTube
Geneva Academy>
11 August 2023
In the context of its study on the human rights implications of new and emerging technologies in the military domain, the United Nations Human Rights Council Advisory Group invited our Head of Research and Policy Studies Dr Erica Harper to provide insights and views on this issue – based on research conducted at the Geneva Academy.
In her intervention, Dr Harper shed light on military technologies’ potential impact on human rights and addressed the risks associated with the cross-application of these technologies and the related need for regulation.
Geneva Academy
Adobe
Adobe>
Dr Harper started her intervention by debunking some myths and misconceptions related to these technologies, notably the perception that they are entirely novel. Many have been in development for decades, with militaries experimenting with neuro-weapons dating back to the 1950s. The true innovation lies in the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning into existing military tools, exponentially expanding their capabilities and potential harm. This accelerated integration of AI has thrust the issue into the global spotlight due to its rapid pace.
Dr Harper also stressed the misconception that these technologies are solely developed for military purposes, underlying their extensive borrowing and repurposing across various sectors. For instance, neurotechnology initially designed for therapeutic purposes in medical settings has evolved to have military applications, and predictive algorithms, originally developed for different contexts, have found utility in automating risk assessment and building autonomous weapons systems.
Interestingly, Dr Harper stressed that the main drivers behind these technologies' development have shifted from the military itself to private companies – a shift that led to a significant reduction in costs, making military-grade devices like drones and TCDS headsets more accessible and affordable. However, this accessibility has inadvertently opened doors for non-state armed groups and private military and security companies to acquire and employ these technologies.
Dr Harper also underscored that these technologies are not only being embraced by the military and non-state actors but are also increasingly integrated into law enforcement and government surveillance efforts. The risks associated with these technologies falling into the wrong hands are very real, potentially leading to a multitude of ethical and human rights violations.
Adobe>
Dr Harper underlined that the heart of the issue revolves around the regulation of these rapidly advancing technologies – stressing the complexities around regulation given the rapid evolution of these technologies and the challenges of distinguishing between benign and weaponized applications.
She suggested that effective regulation requires a multifaceted approach involving various stakeholders and dimensions: human rights considerations, AI law, trade controls, private sector self-regulation, and supra-national oversight bodies – all deemed necessary to ensure responsible development and application of these technologies. Dr Harper emphasized the importance of human rights, as a guiding principle in these discussions.
Geneva Academy>
We are conducting dedicated research on the human rights impact of new technologies and the related need for regulation via two dedicated projects that will culminate in the development of guidelines on the development and use of these new technologies in conformity with human rights.
News
Adobe
Our new Research Brief The Evolving Neurotechnology Landscape: Examining the Role and Importance of Human Rights in Regulation provides a comprehensive background analysis on the complexities of regulating neurotechnology and the role of human rights in this process and marks the inception of our research project on neurotechnology and human rights.
News
Women in International Law is a new podcast series of the Geneva Academy and ATLAS Network that showcases women with diverse experiences and career paths in the field.
Training
UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré
This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.
Training
Adobe
This training course will examine how the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights have been utilized to advance the concept of business respect for human rights throughout the UN system, the impact of the Guiding Principles on other international organizations, as well as the impact of standards and guidance developed by these different bodies.
Project
Victoria Pickering
This project aims at providing support to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association Clément Voulé by addressing emerging issues affecting civic space and eveloping tools and materials allowing various stakeholders to promote and defend civic space.
Project
CCPR Centre
The Geneva Human Rights Platform collaborates with a series of actors to reflect on the implementation of international human rights norms at the local level and propose solutions to improve uptake of recommendations and decisions taken by Geneva-based human rights bodies at the local level.
Publication
Geneva Academy ICRC
Publication
Geneva Academy
