18 October 2023, 18:00-19:30
Register start 15 September 2023
Register end 18 October 2023
Human Rights Conversations
Between 2018 and 2020, Meta (formerly Facebook) worked to set up a unique mechanism to help the company ‘answer some of the most difficult questions around freedom of expression online: what to take down, what to leave up and why’. The Oversight Board, which became fully operational at the end of 2020, is empowered to review content decisions taken by Facebook and Instagram and which have been appealed by users and to provide policy guidance to Meta either following a case decision or upon a specific request from the company. Most importantly, while the Oversight Board is empowered to interpret Meta’s content policies and values, it must also consider the impact of the company’s content decisions ‘in light of human rights norms protecting free expression’.
Since its inception and until the end of 2022, the Oversight Board has delivered 32 decisions, addressing issues ranging from COVID misinformation to hate speech, but also in relation to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the influence of law enforcement on content removals. In delivering these decisions, the Oversight Board has relied on a wide range of human rights standards, including treaty provisions, General Comments by United Nations (UN) treaty bodies, reports from UN Special Procedures and other relevant UN declarations.
If the value of international human rights law in online content moderation has been contested by some commentators, it is undeniable that the Oversight Board has quickly become one of the few mechanisms that is currently producing most jurisprudence on the exercise of the right to freedom of expression online. It has also been argued that its design and features also closely resemble those of human rights tribunals, signalling a potential for the Oversight Board to further expand its authority, develop human rights norms, and influence efforts to regulate social media platforms.
This Human Rights Conversation aims to explore to what extent an independent mechanism such as the Oversight Board is akin to a human rights tribunal, with its strengths and weaknesses, as well as assessing its potential for further clarifying the application of human rights standards in the online sphere but also the risks that could be linked to delegating such powers to a private authority.
This Human Rights Conversation will be followed by drinks.
Human Rights Conversations are a series of events, hosted by the Geneva Human Rights Platform, aimed at discussing contemporary issues and challenges related to the promotion and protection of human rights in Geneva and beyond.
This event may be filmed, recorded and/or photographed on behalf of the Geneva Academy. The Geneva Academy may use these recordings and photographs for internal and external communications for information, teaching and research purposes, and/or promotion and illustration through its various media channels (website, social media, newsletters, annual report, etc.).
By participating in this event, you are agreeing to the possibility of appearing in the aforementioned films, recordings and photographs, and their subsequent use by the Geneva Academy.
Our new Working Paper invites readers to embark on a critical journey, shedding light on the intricate dynamics between security and human rights and calls for us to consider the effectiveness of counterterrorism policies as a matter of human rights law, demonstrating the benefits of this approach in improving the rationality of the decision-making process.
This landmark event of our Geneva Human Rights Platform focused on the need to bridge the gap between Geneva-based human rights mechanisms and the UN in New York, based on the interrelated nature of human rights issues across both cities.
This discussion will look into election processes for UN TBs, the impact of Feminist Foreign Policy on this process, what can we learn from fellow international mechanisms, as well as the inclusion of a vetting process.
This online short course focuses on the specific issues that arise in times of armed conflict regarding the respect, protection and fulfilment of human rights. It addresses key issues like the applicability of human rights in times of armed conflict; the possibilities of restricting human rights under systems of limitations and derogations; and the extraterritorial application of human rights law.
This training course will delve into the means and mechanisms through which national actors can best coordinate their human rights monitoring and implementation efforts, enabling them to strategically navigate the UN human rights system and use the various mechanisms available in their day-to-day work.
Olivier Chamard / Geneva Academy
The Treaty Body Members’ Platform connects experts in UN treaty bodies with each other as well as with Geneva-based practitioners, academics and diplomats to share expertise, exchange views on topical questions and develop synergies.
The Geneva Human Rights Platform collaborates with a series of actors to reflect on the implementation of international human rights norms at the local level and propose solutions to improve uptake of recommendations and decisions taken by Geneva-based human rights bodies at the local level.