A new research project, carried out in partnership with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), will explore the humanitarian consequences and protection needs caused by the digitalization of armed conflicts and the extent to which these are addressed in international humanitarian law (IHL).
Robin Geiß, Swiss IHL Chair at the Geneva Academy, is conducting this project.
New (military) technologies have a profound impact on how wars are fought. Significant advances in the fields of cyberspace, artificial intelligence, robotics or space technology are at the forefront of contemporary geopolitical power struggles and already bring major transformative shifts in military and humanitarian affairs.
‘While IHL is applicable to all technological developments in warfare, the speed, scale, and transformative impact of today’s technological advances require a constant (re-)assessment whether new means and methods of warfare are compatible with existing IHL rules’ explains Robin Geiß.
‘Our research precisely aims at considering the effects of these developments and at assessing whether IHL continues to provide the level of humanitarian protection it is meant to ensure – notably for conflict-affected populations – in contemporary and future warfare’ he adds.
Screenshots of Obsolete, a video game>
The research will notably address issues related to artificial intelligence in military decision-making, cyberwarfare, as well as data protection in times of war.
‘This project is at the forefront of contemporary protection challenges in times of war. While the international community started to assess the impact of and protection challenges raised by artificial intelligence and manipulative cyber operations in peacetime, we need to do the same in times of armed conflict’ underlines Professor Gloria Gaggioli, Director of the Geneva Academy.
‘The analysis will allow us to see whether we need to develop or clarify the law and policy framework beyond the protection that IHL currently affords: this is crucial to ensure the relevance of this body of law for victims of armed conflict in the years to come’ explains Robin Geiß.
Besides the partnership with the ICRC, the research will involve other actors, including the private sector, states, humanitarian organizations and academia.
‘Our objective is to conduct broad consultations with all the relevant stakeholders in order to get the facts right, ask the right questions and identify areas where we think legal protection needs to be improved’ says Robin Geiß.
The first public event of this new research initiative will take place on 29 October 2020. It will explore the rapidly evolving digitalization of armed conflicts.
In August 2021, following the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, the Taliban have rapidly taken control of most of the country, Kabul included.
NASA on Unsplash
In her winning essay Digital Safe Havens: Sheltering Civilians From Military Cyber Operations, Isabelle Peart brings forward novel suggestions on how to reduce the risk of harm to civilians posed by military cyber operations.
VOA, via Wikimedia Commons
This online IHL talk aims at shining light on some of the many legal, political and protection-related challenges stemming from the situation in Afghanistan.
The 2021 edition will address two contemporary challenges and issues related to armed conflict: the classification of non-international armed conflicts in which a myriad of armed non-state actors are involved; and cyber conflicts.
This short course, which can be followed in Geneva or online, looks at the sources from which public international law rules stem and at the entities that are empowered with the capacity of law-making in the international legal order. It aims at enabling participants to develop a global perception of the international normative system.
This short course, which can be followed in Geneva or online, examines the conduct of hostilities in situations of international armed conflict, also known as the Law of The Hague.
This research aims at building a common understanding and vision as to how states and the relevant parts of the UN system can provide a concrete and practical framework to address human rights responsibilities of armed non-state actors.
UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe