ICRC>
29 June 2021
In his new book War – published by Oxford University Press in its Clarendon Law Series – our Former Director and Faculty Member Professor Andrew Clapham discusses the relevance of the concept of war today and examines how our notions about war continue to influence how we conceive rights and obligations in national and international law.
‘The idea of war often operates to legitimate something that would otherwise be illegal. Killing people is normally outlawed; destroying property is normally something that ought to be punished or compensated; seizing property is normally theft; locking people up should be justified through elaborate procedures. But when one can claim ‘there’s a war on’, the justifications for killing, destroying, seizing and interning apparently become self-evident’ underlines Professor Andrew Clapham.
‘With this book, I take a step back and, by looking at the contemporary relevance of the concept of war, I question whether claiming to be in a war grants anyone a licence to kill people, destroy things, and acquire other people’s property or territory’ he adds.
Graduate Institute
OUP
ICRC>
The book provides an overall account of the contemporary law of war and a detailed inquiry into whether states should be able to continue to claim so-called belligerent rights over their enemies and those accused of breaching expectations of neutrality, including those ancient rights connected to booty, blockade and enemy property at sea.
‘The point I want to highlight is that old ideas about what is permissible in war have survived when many of them should have been buried along with the legal institution of War’ explains Professor Clapham.
In his analysis, Professor Clapham separates the old idea of War with a capital ‘W’, which allowed states to claim belligerent rights based on the ancient practice, from today’s reality where armed conflicts and contemporary wars are regulated by detailed treaty provisions.
He concludes that claiming to be in a war or an armed conflict does not grant anyone a licence to kill people, destroy things, and acquire other people’s property or territory.
Defence Image/Crown Copyright
Olivier Chamard/Geneva Academy>
Professor Clapham started to work on this book while he was the Director of the Geneva Academy.
‘As Director of the Geneva Academy, I hosted many discussions on the laws of war. I was often told that the fact of being in a war meant one had to be 'pragmatic' or 'realistic' and refrain from making suggestions that would make it ‘impossible for parties to win the war’. But why should we make it easy for someone to win a war they are not entitled to fight in the first place? I felt the justification for fighting a war must affect what the law entitles a state to do. So I looked a bit deeper into the topic and started imagining this book’ explains Professor Clapham.
Geneva Academy
Olivier Chamard/Geneva Academy>
While this book will be of use to anyone interested in contemporary international relations, it is most specifically aimed at graduate law students who want to understand the ways in which the concept of war is relevant to the application of law today.
For the upcoming 2021-2022 academic year, Professor Clapham will integrate the reflection and content of his new book in his LLM course, which will be entitled 'Human Rights and War'.
ICRC
Defence Image/Crown Copyright
Geneva Academy
The Geneva Academy has published the first spot report from the 'IHL in Focus' research project, ‘Food Insecurity in Armed Conflict and the Use of Siege-like Tactics.’
ICRC
Our latest research brief, 'Navigating Pathways Toward Transitional Justice in Ukraine' examines the initiatives currently unfolding in Ukraine and assesses how they can lead to a holistic transitional justice process.
ICRC
Co-hosted with the ICRC, this event aims to enhance the capacity of academics to teach and research international humanitarian law, while also equipping policymakers with an in-depth understanding of ongoing legal debates.
ICRC
This online short course discusses the extent to which states may limit and/or derogate from their international human rights obligations in order to prevent and counter-terrorism and thus protect persons under their jurisdiction.
ICRC
This online short course provides an overview of the content and evolution of the rules governing the use of unilateral force in international law, including military intervention on humanitarian grounds and the fight against international terrorism. It focuses on the practice of states and international organizations.
The Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts project (RULAC) is a unique online portal that identifies and classifies all situations of armed violence that amount to an armed conflict under international humanitarian law (IHL). It is primarily a legal reference source for a broad audience, including non-specialists, interested in issues surrounding the classification of armed conflicts under IHL.
UNAMID
This project will develop guidance to inform security, human rights and environmental debates on the linkages between environmental rights and conflict, and how their better management can serve as a tool in conflict prevention, resilience and early warning.