CCPR Centre>
23 November 2021
The ten United Nations (UN) human rights treaty bodies (TBs) oversee the implementation by states of the international legal obligations they accept when they become a party to the relevant treaties. While their contribution to human rights protection is important, they are little known to non-expert audiences.
Our new Working Paper Promoting Quality, Independent and Diverse Treaty Body Membership discuss the membership of UN TBs, a key issue to ensure proper human rights protection and the credibility of the overall system.
Written by Dr Claire Callejon – a leading expert on UN TBs functioning –, it starts by identifying the current shortfalls and then moves to propose concrete solutions for a more institutionalized, open and transparent selection process to ensure quality, independent and diverse TB membership.
‘This paper gives an overview of the current membership and practices of nomination and election but also draws inspiration from informal NGO initiatives and election processes in other courts and monitoring bodies. On this basis, it puts forward suggestions for a more stringent and transparent election process, which would definitely benefit the openness, credibility and impact of the system’ says Felix Kirchmeier, Executive Director of the Geneva Human Rights Platform.
Geneva Academy
CCPR Centre>
The analysis of UN TB membership – 172 experts who sit in the 10 UN TBs – raises a number of questions in terms of expertise, independence and diversity.
‘The procedures for selection, nomination and election of UN TB members is not very widely known. Such low visibility invites for non-transparent processes, where political considerations sometimes can take precedent over substantive concerns. This compromises the independence and the effectiveness of TB membership, with potential negative effects on the system as a whole’ underlines Felix Kirchmeier.
For instance, the analysis reveals that many experts hold executive positions in their respective governments or work for different ministries and in various capacities. Similarly, while the current total number shows an almost equal representation of male and female members among TBs – with 88 men and 84 women – gender parity can only be found in two Committees, namely the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture.
Mathias P.R. Reding, Unsplash>
The research highlights that open, formal and transparent processes for nominating candidates at the national level remain the exception, and therefore not provide the guarantees that states parties nominate the best candidates. It also shows that screening mechanisms to review nominations are instrumental in assisting states parties to elect the most suitable candidates.
Based on this analysis, the author calls for the establishment of procedural guarantees to oversee compliance of prospective candidates and makes specific recommendations regarding the nomination of experts, their election and the transparency and availability of information about candidates.
‘As a resource document, this paper will surely be useful for academics and civil society representatives engaged in strengthening the UN TB system. But the document also gives a neutral insight into today’s procedures for states wanting to know the options out there to best handle the selection of TB members’ explains Felix Kirchmeier.
Element5 Digital, Unsplash>
This Working Paper will serve as a background for an upcoming GHRP Friday that will discuss on 3 December 2021 the nomination, election and membership of UN TBs.
The GHRP Fridays provide an opportunity for all stakeholders to discuss the results of the United Nations (UN) Treaty Body (TB) 2020 Review and practical ways to implement change. They are open to all interested delegations, TB members, staff from the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and civil society.
This event series of the Geneva Human Rights Platform – co-organized with the Permanent Missions of Belgium, Canada, Costa Rica, Morocco, Switzerland and Uruguay to the UN in Geneva – aims at discussing the outcomes of the 2020 UN Treaty Body Review.
Geneva Academy
Participants from six countries across the Middle East and North Africa region joined our customized training on the Geneva-based United Nations human rights mechanisms
Geneva Academy
Sixteen diplomats from fifteen Small Island Developing States and Least Developed Countries participated in a two-day Practical Training on Human Rights Council Procedures.
LATSIS Symposium
This interactive, two-part workshop will explore how modern data-science tools – including machine learning and AI – can be leveraged to support the United Nations in promoting and protecting human rights.
LATSIS Symposium
This Human Rights Conversation will explore how AI is being used by human rights institutions to enhance the efficiency, scope, and impact of monitoring and implementation frameworks.
UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré
This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.
Participants in this training course will be introduced to the major international and regional instruments for the promotion of human rights, as well as international environmental law and its implementation and enforcement mechanisms.
CCPR Centre
The Geneva Human Rights Platform collaborates with a series of actors to reflect on the implementation of international human rights norms at the local level and propose solutions to improve uptake of recommendations and decisions taken by Geneva-based human rights bodies at the local level.
Victoria Pickering
This project aims at providing support to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association Clément Voulé by addressing emerging issues affecting civic space and eveloping tools and materials allowing various stakeholders to promote and defend civic space.
Geneva Academy
Geneva Academy