New Research Brief Evaluates the Effectiveness of GDPR in Mitigating Risks Associated with the Distinctive Nature of Neurodata

21 January 2025

Advances in neurotechnology (NT) have driven the growing collection and processing of neurodata – data related to the structure and functioning of the human brain – across various societal domains. The development and use of NTs heavily depend on neurodata to ensure device functionality (e.g., neurofeedback monitors or brain-computer interfaces) and to enhance performance by refining AI algorithms integrated into these devices.

In our new Research Brief, ‘Neurodata: Navigating GDPR and AI Act Compliance in the Context of Neurotechnology’, Timo Istace highlights the delicate balance needed between leveraging neurodata for progress and protecting individual rights. He notes that ‘the indispensability of neurodata to fuelling progress in the sector needs to be balanced against the risks to individual users. Neurodata is a highly sensitive and personal form of data, akin to genetic data. Its combined features – including its informational richness (extending to cognitive processes), predictive potential, and risk of involuntary disclosure – warrant significant scrutiny to preserve individuals’ privacy, particularly mental privacy.’

Timo further explains, ‘Data protection regulations are crucial in addressing these concerns. The sensitive nature of neurodata raises questions around whether current regulatory frameworks offer adequate protection against incursions on mental privacy and the safeguarding of neurodata. While no supranational regulation specifically addresses neurodata, regional instruments like the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (2018) provide a framework for assessing protection measures.’

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of the GDPR in mitigating risks associated with the distinctive nature of neurodata, with the goal of safeguarding neuroprivacy and mental privacy in the context of emerging NTs. It analyzes the scope and applicability of the GDPR, examines the challenges of ensuring robust protection during the collection, processing, storage, and transfer of neurodata, and considers how the recent EU AI Act might complement or reinforce GDPR safeguards.

MORE ON THIS THEMATIC AREA

EQINET Logo News

In Highlight: Equality Bodies Comparison Dashboard

20 August 2025

Via its DHRTTDs Directory, the Geneva Human Rights Platform provides a comprehensive list and description of such key tools and databases. But how to navigate them? Which tool should be used for what, and by whom? This interview helps us understand better the specificities of the current highlight of the directory: Equality Bodies Comparison Dashboard

Read more

GHRP at LATSIS News

Bridging Human Rights and Data Science at the 2025 Latsis Symposium

22 September 2025

The 2025 Latsis Symposium on Science for Global Development and Humanitarian Action, organized by ETH for Development, gave prominent space to human rights issues.

Read more

Crops view from the sky Project

The Right to Food in Europe

Started in December 2022

This research will provide legal expertise to a variety of stakeholders on the implementation of the right to food, and on the right to food as a legal basis for just transformation toward sustainable food systems in Europe. It will also identify lessons learned from the 2023 recognition of the right to food in the Constitution of the Canton of Geneva.  

Read more

Session of a UN Treaty Body Project

Treaty Bodies Individual Communications Procedures

Started in January 2019

Read more

Cover of the 2023 Geneva Academy Annual Report Publication

Annual Report 2024

published on July 2025

Read more