New Research Brief Evaluates the Effectiveness of GDPR in Mitigating Risks Associated with the Distinctive Nature of Neurodata

21 January 2025

Advances in neurotechnology (NT) have driven the growing collection and processing of neurodata – data related to the structure and functioning of the human brain – across various societal domains. The development and use of NTs heavily depend on neurodata to ensure device functionality (e.g., neurofeedback monitors or brain-computer interfaces) and to enhance performance by refining AI algorithms integrated into these devices.

In our new Research Brief, ‘Neurodata: Navigating GDPR and AI Act Compliance in the Context of Neurotechnology’, Timo Istace highlights the delicate balance needed between leveraging neurodata for progress and protecting individual rights. He notes that ‘the indispensability of neurodata to fuelling progress in the sector needs to be balanced against the risks to individual users. Neurodata is a highly sensitive and personal form of data, akin to genetic data. Its combined features – including its informational richness (extending to cognitive processes), predictive potential, and risk of involuntary disclosure – warrant significant scrutiny to preserve individuals’ privacy, particularly mental privacy.’

Timo further explains, ‘Data protection regulations are crucial in addressing these concerns. The sensitive nature of neurodata raises questions around whether current regulatory frameworks offer adequate protection against incursions on mental privacy and the safeguarding of neurodata. While no supranational regulation specifically addresses neurodata, regional instruments like the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (2018) provide a framework for assessing protection measures.’

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of the GDPR in mitigating risks associated with the distinctive nature of neurodata, with the goal of safeguarding neuroprivacy and mental privacy in the context of emerging NTs. It analyzes the scope and applicability of the GDPR, examines the challenges of ensuring robust protection during the collection, processing, storage, and transfer of neurodata, and considers how the recent EU AI Act might complement or reinforce GDPR safeguards.

MORE ON THIS THEMATIC AREA

GHRP at LATSIS News

Bridging Human Rights and Data Science at the 2025 Latsis Symposium

22 September 2025

The 2025 Latsis Symposium on Science for Global Development and Humanitarian Action, organized by ETH for Development, gave prominent space to human rights issues.

Read more

GHRP Ai for Good Workshop News

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Human Rights Monitoring: Key Takeaways from the AI for Good Workshop

22 July 2025

Our event brought together human rights practitioners, data scientists, and AI experts to explore how artificial intelligence can support efforts to monitor human rights and the Sustainable Development Goals.

Read more

Project

Follow-up Review Pilot Series

Started in November 2021

Read more

A destroyed camp for internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Khor Abeche, South Darfur, Project

Understanding the Relationship between Conflict, Security and the Human Right to a Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment

Started in May 2023

This project will develop guidance to inform security, human rights and environmental debates on the linkages between environmental rights and conflict, and how their better management can serve as a tool in conflict prevention, resilience and early warning.

Read more

Cover of the 2023 Geneva Academy Annual Report Publication

Annual Report 2024

published on July 2025

Read more