Olivier Chamard/Geneva Academy
20 February 2020
Dr Annyssa Bellal is Senior Research Fellow and Strategic Adviser on International Humanitarian Law (IHL) at the Geneva Academy. She currently works on a research project on armed groups and IHL and recently briefed the United Nations (UN) Security Council on current challenges in IHL.
I am a Swiss Algerian national and grew up in Ethiopia. My father was a diplomat at the African Union so I guess I was, since my childhood, predisposed to evolve in an international environment. I, therefore, started studying international relations at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. Thanks to the teachings of one of my mentors, Professor Andrew Clapham, I got more interested in human rights law and applied for an additional degree in the history and philosophy of human rights at the University of Grenoble. Then I started my PhD at the Graduate Institute and got, in parallel, an MA in law. Although I knew from the start I did not want to become a practising lawyer, I never regretted studying law. It allowed me to better understand some of the very legal concepts in international law, such as the law on state responsibility or international criminal law. But even if it seemed I got obsessed by getting academic degrees (I have two Masters, two LLMs and one PhD), I was in fact always interested in having both an academic experience and a practical one.
Right after my studies, I started working as a legal adviser at the Directorate of International Law of the Swiss Department of Foreign Affairs. This was a very formative and rewarding experience and I learned a lot about the political underpinnings of international law and its implementation by states. After that, I also worked as a legal adviser for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the International Committee of the Red Cross and Geneva Call, where I acquired essential field experience engaging armed non-state actors in different armed conflict situations, including in Northern Iraq, Syria, DRC and Western Sahara.
After these years of practical experience, I wish now to contribute to policy debates, while conducting academic research. I also very much enjoy teaching and consider students as the ones who will continue working towards the construction of a more efficient and effective international legal system. I am lucky enough to have been able to teach IHL, human rights and international criminal law in different universities. At the moment, I give a course on armed non-state actors at the Geneva Academy, teach international criminal law at Sciences Po in Paris and IHL at the University of Berne.
I came to human rights and IHL mainly again through my parents. My father belonged to the political bureau of the National Liberation Front in Algeria. He had been tortured in prison. While he was very discreet about this episode in his life, my mother was enraged about what had happened to him and many others and we talked a lot about the Algerian national liberation war. Both were driven by a desire to always stand by the ideals of freedom and human rights, as well as the respect of the persons in times of war. Although it did not appear so clearly to me at first, I end up writing my doctoral dissertation on the issue of immunity for international crimes, focusing on the crime of torture. Retrospectively, I think I was trying to continue their legacy.
Together with Geneva Call, I am working at the moment on a research project aiming at collecting the practice and interpretation that armed groups have about certain key norms of IHL and human rights.
Armed groups are key actors in contemporary armed conflicts, for the good and the bad. Yet, their views and extent to which they are able to implement their obligations under international law are neglected by states, mostly for political reasons. Research has shown though that an efficient engagement with these actors on humanitarian norms must involve some kind of ownership of the law. This is why collecting their views is important.
It is always difficult to evaluate the impact of a research project. Surely, violations of humanitarian and human rights law will not cease merely by collecting armed non-state actors’ practice and views on the law. But at the very least and hopefully, one of the impacts will be to raise awareness on the importance to not only consider these actors as ‘terrorist groups’, as many states do today and which can result in impeding or even criminalizing humanitarian aid and action. In some instances, doctors have been sanctioned for providing medical aid to fighters belonging to armed non-state actors, listed as terrorist organizations. Considering all armed non-state actors as terrorist is also a powerful disincentive for them to respect the law and a good excuse for states to treat them somehow as ‘exceptions’ to the otherwise applicable rules on status, detention or conduct of hostilities.
For IHL, one of the first challenges that comes to my mind is the problem of implementation and impunity. A lot is being done, but states are not scared enough about what could happen if they disregard IHL in the conflicts they are involved in. Criminal sanctions, both at the national and international levels, should be much more common for state officials who have committed war crimes. Another major challenge both for IHL and human rights is linked to climate change and the impact it will have on the economic survival of many populations, which is bound to induce massive displacement of populations. Suffice to witness how refugees and displaced persons are treated today in some of our democracies during relatively peaceful times to imagine how human rights will be respected when ‘real’ environmental emergencies will occur.
Apart from international law, I have two other passions: reading novels and cinema.
While the armed violence between the government and the drug cartels, as well as between cartels themselves, remains high, it has become increasingly challenging to attribute these instances of violence and clashes to specific armed groups.
A one-day consultation aimed at discussing with a variety of experts the challenges, opportunities and best practices arising from an increased reliance on open source information in accountability processes.
In this talk, Professor Frédéric Mégret will seek to excavate an understanding of IHL as partly about protecting one’s population rather than minimizing harm to ‘other’ populations.
In this lecture organized with the MIDS, Professor Chiara Giorgetti will discuss current efforts to create a reparation mechanism for Ukraine in order to hold Russia liable for its violations of international law.
This training course will explore the major international and regional instruments for the promotion of human rights, as well as with their implementation and enforcement mechanisms; and provide practical insights into the different UN human rights mechanisms pertinent to advancing environmental issues and protecting environmental human rights defenders.
Organized by the Geneva Academy and the ICRC, the Advanced IHL seminar for academics and humanitarian policymakers aims to enhance the capacity of academics to teach and research IHL and contemporary issues arising during armed conflict, while also equipping policymakers with an in-depth understanding of ongoing legal debates and their relevance to decision-making.
The Geneva Human Rights Platform collaborates with a series of actors to reflect on the implementation of international human rights norms at the local level and propose solutions to improve uptake of recommendations and decisions taken by Geneva-based human rights bodies at the local level.
This research aimed at taking stock of and contributing to a better understanding of the above-mentioned challenges to the principle of universality of human rights while also questioning their validity.